Search for: "Cross v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield" Results 221 - 240 of 351
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 7:58 pm by Peter Vodola
Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 447 Pa.Super. 436, 669 A.2d 975, 983 (Pa.Super.1995). * * * Significantly, the court has declared that causes of action in the nature of a penalty are not assignable. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:34 am by Jared Klaus
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, No. 09-2607 (Aug. 12, 2011), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s decision to certify the class, which would have consisted of between 550 to 875 self-insured plans that entered into Administrative Services Contracts (“ASC’s”) with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (“BCBSM”). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:00 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Now that you have some understanding of the case, here’s the update: The Office of Personnel Management recently sent Blue Cross Blue Shield a letter ordering it to “implement an expeditious enrollment” of Golinksi’s spouse. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:16 pm by Gideon Alper
The following Florida companies have all of the above benefits, according to the Human Rights Campaign’s annual Corporate Equality Index: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida - Jacksonville Burger King – Miami Carlton Fields - Tampa CSX - Jacksonville Darden Restaurants – Orlando Greenburg Taurig - Miami Holland & Knight - Tampa Office Depot – Boca Raton Raymond James Financial – St. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 7:06 am by Max Czernin
  The appeal had been taken by Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan in connection with an antitrust suit brought by the State of Michigan which sought to enjoin Blue Cross from using most favored nation clauses in its contracts with Michigan hospitals. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:26 am by James Hamilton
Therefore, the court accepted the SEC’s offer to revise its proposed final judgments as stated, citing Blue Cross and Blue Shield Ass’n v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:46 pm by Nicole Moody
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, the plaintiffs, parents of children who allegedly suffer from anorexia or bulimia, sued their health insurer for denying claims for benefits for their children. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:49 am by Jason Byrne
  In that case the Court was reviewing the trial court’s order for the payment of victim restitution to Blue Cross Blue Shield. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 12:09 pm by Nicole Moody
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, the plaintiffs, parents of children who allegedly suffer from anorexia or bulimia, sued their health insurer for denying claims for benefits for their children. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:58 am by Julie Lam
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, No. 142671. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:13 pm by Bonny Rafel
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, 301 B.R. 662 (Bankr D.N.J. 2003) (providers have standing to demand payment in the absence of an anti-assignment clause), and Ambulatory Surgical Center of New Jersey v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:23 pm by scanner1
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MONTANA, NEW WEST HEALTH SERVICES, MONTANA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION, STATE OF MONTANA, and JOHN DOES 1-100, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:15 am by emagraken
  It is for that reason that I expect that counsel have included in the book of authorities Blue Line Hockey Acquisition Co., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:14 am by Stanley D. Baum
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, No. 10-4225 (10th Cir. 2011), the plaintiff, Eugene S. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:48 am by Bexis
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield, 2007 WL 7393489 (D.N.J. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:25 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana, Inc., Case 1:11-cv-00123-RFC, will appear at CCH Trade Regulation Reports ¶51,000.A press release, the complaint, and the proposed final judgment in the case appear on the website of the U.S. [read post]