Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 16,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 9:08 pm
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
., State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:16 am
Ratification by more states in which a talaq is a legally effective form of divorce and by more European states would provide the much-needed security for families moving from Islamic states to Europe. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
There are lots of names for people crossing the border into Texas without authority, including migrants, immigrants, illegals, undocumented noncitizens, illegal entrants. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
On 14 February 2024 there will be a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:55 am
” In response, the court stated, “Essentially, you’re doing it from a phone in a car, and you can’t use your phone to look at documents and appear in a hearing. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
” On cross-examination, Clayton stated that “brakes were working normal when I road tested it. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm
Continue Reading The post Law With Impact – 4 Years Later – Student Suicide Prevention: Nguyen v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
Since we affirm the district court’s rulings on the state law claims, we need not resolve the federal law cross appeal. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am
The claimant also made clear when cross-examined, and we accept, that he is not and was not supportive or ‘open to’ violence as a means of opposing Zionism” [237]. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
A short excerpt from today's long decision by Judge Trevor McFadden (D.D.C.) in Newman v. [read post]
