Search for: "Cross v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2019, 12:26 am by Jamison Koehler
If the government introduces new evidence during re-direct examination, the defense has a constitutional right to question the witness about that new evidence. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:40 am
McKnight).Oral Cross-Examination of Foreign Witness: General Cigar acknowledged that under Rule 2.124, cross-examination of a witness outside the jurisdiction of the United States is to be taken by deposition on written questions. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
The rule finalizes EPA's finding that the trading programs in the Transport Rule, also known as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), achieve greater reasonable progress towards the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas than source-specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) in those states covered by the Transport Rule [See WIMS 6/7/12]. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 8:41 am by Heather Weaver
As Justice Samuel Alito noted in his concurring opinion in Buono, during World War I, “[m]ore than 3,500 Jewish soldiers … gave their lives for the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:51 pm by Jane Chong
Last Friday plaintiffs (appellees/cross-appellants) in Klayman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
Immediately after World War I, commentators regularly claimed that the United States was a “Christian nation. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:37 am by Ken
Today, as CNN reported, the United States Supreme Court rejected cert in the case Bogani Charles Calhoun v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:01 am
Second Circuit reverses gang convictions based on erroneous law enforcement expert testimony, which included inadmissible testimony on factual matters; merely repeating hearsay statements without using expertise to reach an opinion; and repeating and summarizing the testimonial statements of others violated the Confrontation Clause, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
Regardless of whether you are happy with the outcome of the Affordable Care Act or not, you can celebrate one thing: United States Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts, a George W. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:25 pm by WIMS
      In the first case, after trial, the United States Court of Federal Claims awarded Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants System Fuels, Inc. and Entergy Arkansas, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm by Wells Bennett
  He appealed and the United States cross-appealed; the case was then briefed and argued. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:23 am by Michael M. O'Hear
Congress passed the Implementation Act in 1998 in order to give the Convention effect in the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
District Court Judge ruled on cross-motions for summary judgment filed, respectively, by the plaintiff who brought the lawsuit and by the defendant:  March v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 12:43 pm
Soledad cross, even though he was not on Hunter's staff.In Trunk v. [read post]