Search for: "Cross v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 7,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am by Annie Shiel
” It was hardly the first time the United States had heard this warning. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Kate Huddleston
An undocumented individual who crossed the border decades ago, or someone who had just crossed fleeing persecution in Mexico, would be at risk of summary expulsion by a state or local law enforcement officer. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
The preliminary injunction issued on July 4, 2023, by the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana … as modified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on October 3, 2023 … is stayed. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am by Jacob Wirz
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Hannah Rosborough
Rule 3.5 echoes citation practices in the United Kingdom. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 1:42 pm by Jamison Koehler
United States, 287 A.3d 1241 (D.C. 2023), was charged with Assault with Intent to Kill ... [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 11:20 pm by Florian Mueller
So far I've been able to download from an electronic court docket the following complaint that was filed with the United States District Court for the Western Division of the Eastern District of North Carolina: Ericsson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Flowers Foods is the second-largest commercial bakery in the United States whose brands include Wonder Bread, Tastykake, Sunbeam, and Nature’s Own. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit held that because Vullo’s actions did not cross over the line from permissible attempts to convince into improper attempts to coerce, and in any event did not violate clearly established law, she was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]