Search for: "D. (D.) VS. S. (A.), ET AL." Results 221 - 240 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm by Chris Martin
  Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al vs Frank's Casing, 246 S.W. 42 (Tex. 2008). [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm by legalinformatics
This is the first volume in Springer’s new Law, Governance, and Technology Series, edited by Professors Casanovas and Sartor. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
Synco spa (EPLAW) Court of appeal confirms first judgment finding infringement of plant variety:  Maurizio Bindi vs. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Dickinson Wright and John Artz (Patently-O) (PharmaPatents) BPAI: Removing terminal disclaimers by patent reissue: Ex parte Shunpei Yamazaki (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Ohio: Equitable intervening rights: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am by Michael Sweig, JD
Berryman, et al, 878 F. 2d 786 (4th Cir. 1989), four dissenting judges in an en banc decision found that the Virginia Employment Commission violated the plaintiff’s First Amendment right to free exercise of religion when it denied her unemployment benefits which she sought because she said it was “the right thing to do” for her to follow her religious conviction, and therefore, quit her job to follow her husband’s move 150 miles away from… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am by Michael Sweig, JD
Berryman, et al, 878 F. 2d 786 (4th Cir. 1989), four dissenting judges in an en banc decision found that the Virginia Employment Commission violated the plaintiff’s First Amendment right to free exercise of religion when it denied her unemployment benefits which she sought because she said it was “the right thing to do” for her to follow her religious conviction, and therefore, quit her job to follow her husband’s move 150 miles away from… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) N D Ohio: Damages award exceeding stipulated 4% royalty rate was not excessive: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am by Kelly
Blizzard (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Patent Arcade) (WIRED) (Ars Technica) US – IV files patent suits against nine companies  – Intellectual Ventures v Altera et al; Intellectual Ventures v Check Point Software et al; Intellectual Ventures v Hynix et al(Patently-O) (IAM) (IAM) (IPBiz) (271 Patent Blog) (PatLit) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:31 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
 The lawsuit, brought by several injured Wal-Mart employees, is known as Gianzero v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et. al., US DCT (D. [read post]