Search for: "D. R.C. D." Results 221 - 240 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 5:07 am by Jon Hyman
” … Alexander cited R.C. 1702.80(D) in support of his public policy argument. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
Boczar, 113 Ohio St. 3d 148, 2007-Ohio-1251, 863 N.E.2d 155 (2007), upholding the constitutionality of R.C. 4511.19(D)(4)(b). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:57 am by Russ Bensing
  It starts with the conclusion that “an indictment is defective if it alleges violations of R.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:42 am by Jaclyn West
(Andy, this isn’t legal advice, but just a tip — Dwight wants your job and he’d love to undermine you all the way out the door. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:55 am by David Cosgrove
Notably, however, the pattern of corrupt activity conviction was based solely upon the defendant’s failure to disclose sales commissions on a Reg D filing prepared by his attorney, and the tampering and falsification convictions were predicated upon his failure to disclose a 13 year old misdemeanor bad check conviction on a non-required filing with the Division of Financial Institutions. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by sevach
  La segunda década, vino de la mano del Tribunal Constitucional que al estilo del aperturista Concilio Vaticano II, dictaminó que se podía controlar la valoración de los Tribunales calificadores en caso de “errores manifiestos”, o cuando tratándose de exámenes tipo test, la discrecionalidad resultaba “cero”. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:28 am by Russ Bensing
  Other than that, though, I can’t see how they’d be different. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:06 am by Russ Bensing
Three weeks ago, I’d also blogged about the oral argument in State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  I’d questioned the continued vitality of Cabrales here, and last February discussed the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
Barker, and I’d also discussed the oral argument on that in June. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
Darling, the court held that the specification required the State to show that the school “was operating as a school pursuant to the standards set by the State of Ohio School Board pursuant to R.C. 3301.07. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Read plainly, even though R.C. 2925.11(D) does not create a criminal record, minor misdemeanor possession is still a conviction which is premised upon a statutorily-designated drug abuse offense; to wit, marijuana possession. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:59 am by Russ Bensing
Yeah, that’d make a difference. [read post]