Search for: "DARE v. STATE" Results 221 - 240 of 738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs:… [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 8:39 am
This short film was banned at the time of its 1980s release and is the subject of a well-known European Court of Human Rights decision, Wingrove v UK, which Wingrove lost, with the UK benefitting from a wide ‘margin of appreciation’ in its regulation of certain kinds of offensive speech; the influential elements include the finding that “whereas there is little scope under Article 10 para. 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on debate of… [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:31 am
But his most heretical act may be his observation in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  We saw that when the economists who dared to publish studies showing deterrence were hounded out of the field. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 9:30 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
The Supreme Court recently heard its first big Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) case, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:12 am by Sandy Levinson
  I’m no admirer of Article V; much of the time, I view it as the single worst feature of a Constitution that has many truly awful features. [read post]