Search for: "DH v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
Philippine Star (via ABS-CBN), Oct. 22, 2006.[5] Bolante v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:00 am
Helpful Links United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
It’s Auntie BBC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 11:34 am
American Civil Liberties Union ACLU v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:23 am
Comm’n v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
Annor v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:25 am
In GHG Management v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:11 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm
See, e.g., Poe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 6:58 am
Berlant v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
The Fourth and Seventh Circuits dismissed the states’ motions, and DHS issued a final rule removing the 2019 rule. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:31 pm
The case, Day v. [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 8:54 am
DHS (D.D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am
The Minnesota DHS brief is along the same lines. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:39 am
Ward v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:47 am
DHS Documents DHS response letter - March 3, 2011 U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
However, on December 2, 2016, the Sheriff issued a new policy under which inmates subject to either an ICE detainer accompanied by a United States Department of Homeland Security (hereinafter DHS) Warrant for Arrest of Alien, and/or DHS Warrant of Removal/Deportation, are to be held for up to 48 hours after the time they would otherwise have been released, with ICE to be notified immediately. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm
In Washington v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 1:35 pm
Putting the lie to DOJ fear mongering that the crack retroactivity amendment will put thousands of violent criminals prematurely back on the streets, the judge in United States v. [read post]
