Search for: "DOES 1-101" Results 221 - 240 of 3,328
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2021, 3:30 am by Sami Azhari
NOTE: This page features new content to examine how the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act (Public Act 101-0027) impacted Illinois law. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The rule states:“If the Board of Appeal notes that the appeal does not comply with R 99, paragraph 1(a), it shall communicate this to the appellant and shall invite him to remedy the deficiencies noted within a period to be specified. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:11 am
This type of clause: (1) does not limit the passive sales of the distributors because they can still advertise the products online and it is not possible to circumscribe third-party platform customers; and (2) only restricts a specific type of sale. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:29 am
While the following case does not identify when a knife, for example, qualifies as a gravity knife, it does address one of the enumerated weapons of Fourth Degree Criminal Possession of a Weapon. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 11:56 am
Floor Plan #1 was entitled to copyright protection, but primarily as a compilation. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 3:27 pm by Rory Mir
Ubisoft, an industry giant with over $1 billion in revenue, claimed that Yousician's learning software infringed their "interactive guitar game" patent. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:21 pm by Jim Gerl
Related articles Special Education Law 101 - Part III Special Education Law 101 - Part II Special Education Law 101 - Part I ------- Thanks for subscribing! [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:40 pm by Daniel Nazer
We have submitted multiple rounds of comments (1, 2, 3, and 4) to the Patent Office urging it to be more diligent in applying Alice. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:48 pm by The Sader Law Firm
Department of Education reported that 101 individuals owe at least $1 million dollars in student loans. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 2:51 pm
Here's the only independent claim in the case: 1. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:44 am by Joseph M. Hallman
Hopefully, this decision can help to clarify what does or does not render a patent claim eligible under § 101, especially in terms of claims related to software. [read post]