Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:10 am
In Lax v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Court of appeal of Brussels, 13 October 2022, Mylan v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:43 pm
The latter two approaches are dominant in Indonesian practice. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
If, for instance, the notice targets a dominant company with massive international presence, it is hard to see how such a measure would ever satisfy necessity and proportionality requirements. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:52 pm
The United States, it is widely believed, is at a moment of constitutional crisis. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:52 pm
The United States, it is widely believed, is at a moment of constitutional crisis. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Before applying a post-colonial lens to evaluate the dominant narratives and arguments for and against aggression trials, it is necessary to briefly explain how post-colonialism applies to Eastern Europe and the wider “Global East. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:34 am
Lessons from Rosenthal v Erber My summary hardly does the Court’s analysis in Rosenthal v Erber any justice. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
” It wasn’t until 1938 that the Court, in a footnote to a case, United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:01 pm
Last year, former Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab made changes to the Parole Board rules which prevented Prison and Probation staff from providing the Parole Board with recommendations regarding the release of imprisoned persons, However, it was held to be unlawful and reversed following its High Court challenge, R v Bailey. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In Mallory v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 6:25 am
Here, Ericsson appealed a judgment dated 30th of March 2016 (2016 judgment) which concluded that imposing non-FRAND conditions allows the CCI to act against the violation of sections 3 (collusive practices) and 4 (abuse of dominant position) of the Indian Competition Act.- LPA 150/2020 - Appellant Monsanto Holdings Private Limited (Monsanto); respondents CCI and others. [read post]
