Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,020
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 8:09 am
United States [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], 06-6330, in which the Court considered whether a district judge, in seeking to impose a sentence that is "sufficient but not greater than necessary," should have discretion to sentence a defendant to a prison [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 3:10 am
US [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court held that a defendant's federal drug sentence can be enhanced under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) [text] when the defendant has previously been convicted of a state drug offense punishable [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 3:31 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down three decisions Monday, including United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2005, 1:59 pm
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England [Duke Law backgrounder; merit briefs] concerning whether the state of New Hampshire can require parental notification before a physician can perform an abortion on a minor. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:25 pm
United States [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], 06-1456, where the Court considered "whether merely hiding funds with no design to create the appearance of legitimate wealth is sufficient to support a money laundering conviction" under 18 USC 1956(a)(2)(B) [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:03 am
Piccadilly Cafeterias [Duke Law backgrounder; JURIST report], in which the Court ruled that a federal bankruptcy code provision [11 USC §1146(a) text] exempting certain court-confirmed transfers from state and local transfer taxes applies only after the [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 10:10 am
Arizona [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report] that the state's approach does not violate constitutional due process. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 2:06 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Tuesday heard oral arguments in Randall v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:12 am
My article Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA and the Constitution, 50 Duke L.J. 17 (2000), got cited by the Supreme Court of Washington in Assurance Wireless USA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2006, 7:29 pm
South Carolina [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], a case in which it will decide whether state courts can preclude defendants from presenting evidence that inculpates others for their crimes in capital trials. [read post]
17 Apr 2005, 5:01 pm
Darue Engineering [Duke Law School case backgrounder], 04-603, the Court will decide whether a state quiet title [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:44 am
In Lopez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 3:13 am
Philip Morris [Duke Law case backgrounder], where the Court held that a lawsuit against the tobacco company could not be removed from state to federal court solely based on an argument that the tobacco industry is regulated by the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 2:17 am
Musladin [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court held that a federal appeals court improperly overturned a state court ruling allowing a murder victim's family to wear buttons depicting the victim's face during a criminal trial. [read post]
23 Feb 2005, 12:01 am
United States [case backgrounder from Duke Law School], 03-1566, the Court will review a circuit split on whether [read post]
27 Mar 2006, 6:06 pm
Banks [Duke Law backgrounder, merit briefs], the Court focused on whether the court should regulate states in managing their inmates [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:22 am
Resendiz-Ponce [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court upheld the conviction of Juan Resendiz-Ponce on charges of attempting to re-enter the United States illegally from Mexico after being deported. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:18 am
Wachovia Bank [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court held that the National Bank Act [text] and regulations promulgated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency preempt state laws regulating mortgage lending by national banks and [read post]
1 Jun 2004, 3:10 am
The case is Yarborough v. [read post]
29 Nov 2004, 3:15 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in Ashcroft v. [read post]
