Search for: "Daimler AG" Results 221 - 240 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am by Sophie Corke
At Pizza Limited | Rat Pack / RatPac – Not All Trade Mark Judges are Movie Producers | UK patent exams update: Major changes to invigilation arrangements for candidates taking the exams in the office | UK patent exams update: Final version of FAQs released | When free-riding someone else's brand might be a win-win situation | [Guestpost]: IP implications of 3D printing, a new studyNever Too Late 279 [Week ending August 23] No CJEU reference (yet) as Mannheim… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm by Cleve Clinton
  Hope on the Horizon – Daimler AG v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:43 am by Joe Consumer
Here's one for the rich folks: “BMW AG …is recalling its new flagship 7-series luxury limousine due to a potential air bag deployment issue. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Forbes, Daniel Fisher covers Tuesday’s opinion in Daimler AG v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:20 am by cen
Auf Platz 2 und 3 folgen die Daimler AG (2 014 Anmeldungen) und die Siemens AG (1 910 Anmeldungen). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Genentech Inc. | Design v Copyright in Italy | Unitary patent and double patenting | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd & Anor | IKEA in Indonesia | Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
| Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz.Never too late 86 [week ending on Sunday 6 March] – Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41 | The IPKat team: news, new arrivals and farewells | CJEU in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM | World IP day | Advocate General's opinion in Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe in Austro-Mechana | EPO v trade union | OLG Munich on YouTube liability | UPC… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 6,374,180 (the ‘180 patent), 6,178,380 (the ‘380 patent), 6,029,111 (the ‘111 patent), and 5,862,511 (the ‘511 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Audi AG of Germany Audi of America, Inc. of Auburn Hills, Michigan Audi of America, LLC of Herndon, Virginia Bayerische Motoren Werke AG of Germany BMW of North America, LLC of Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC of Greer, South Carolina Chrysler Group LLC of… [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm by Will Baude
Daimler AG, 727 F.3d 174, 191 (2d Cir. 2013) (“The law of this Circuit already provides answers to some of those questions, including the principle that corporations are not proper defendants under the ATS in light of prevailing customary international law, see Kiobel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:18 am by Sheppard Mullin
  Daimler AG Settlement    On April 1, 2010, the DOJ announced that Daimler AG and a number of its subsidiaries had agreed to pay approximately $185 million in disgorgements and fines to settle FCPA-related charges. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle
In Tyrell, the Court rejected the state’s assertion of personal jurisdiction in light of the Court’s recent decisions in Daimler AG v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:43 am by Steven M. Gursten
My client, Amie Carducci, of Clinton Township, was struck nearly head-on at age 28. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
This week I had the opportunity to hear a presentation by Lorin Reisner, Deputy Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division at PLI’s Securities Litigation & Enforcement Institute 2010. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am by Spencer Persson
The California Court of Appeal and California Supreme Court found that there was no general jurisdiction over BMS in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Daimler AG v. [read post]