Search for: "Davis v. Public Safety " Results 221 - 240 of 389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2022, 6:02 pm by David Kopel
Judge Moore formerly was corporate lawyer (Davis, Graham and Stubbs, Denver), and then head Federal Public Defender for Colo. and Wyoming. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  Damages were assessed, following a default judgment, in the sum of £75,000 On  12 March 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Davies v Carter. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 12 June 2023 Nicklin J dealt with directions in the committal application in Davies v Carter. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
 MacDonald(N.S.C.A., May 11, 2012) (34914) Jan. 17, 2014 To determine if a safety search is reasonably necessary, and therefore justifiable, factors must be weighed to balance the police duty against the liberty interest in question, including: 1. importance of the performance of the duty to the public good; 2. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Doses of 25 mg. immediate-release PPA could not realistically be considered to pose any “absolute safety risk and have a reasonable safety margin. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Jeff Welty
” Most agencies are using widely available DJI drones rather than specialized models marketed specifically for public safety purposes. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm by Aaron Mackey
The plaintiffs agree with Congress that there is a strong public interest in stopping sex trafficking. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Former cabinet minister David Davis has warned that SLAPP (strategic litigation against public participation) libel actions are having a chilling effect on UK journalism, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
Public service runs like a golden cord through the Westrick family tree. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Constitution provides that “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The new policy claims the collection of biometric information is “for safety, security, and identification purposes. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
A complaint against the Enfield Gazette and Advertiser by road safety campaigner Paul Mandel was dismissed by IPSO (01071-17 Mandel v Enfield Gazette & Advertiser). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]