Search for: "Deal v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 12,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2009, 11:58 am
United States Magistrate Judge Leonard P. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:38 pm
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I blogged about a fascinating Fourth Amendment district court decision involving how the border search exception applies to computers, United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:15 am
As a non-immigrant alien, King was ineligible for a license to deal firearms in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 9:06 am
Colvin, August 19, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Mays v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Here is the abstract: Perhaps no decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on “unreasonable search and seizure” has come in for more criticism than Terry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 3:30 pm
Heck, maybe it will even be as important as United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:49 am
The National Conference of State Legislatures estimates that if the debt ceiling is not raised by August 2, the United States will have only $12 billion to pay its $32 billion of obligations. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:34 am
[Post by Venkat] United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 10:24 am
The Sixth Circuit granted en banc review last week in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am
In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am
In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 6:04 am
Since late July, the renegotiation of the NAFTA had been conducted by the United States and Mexico exclusively to have these two countries resolve their differences separately and in the expectation that, once such bilateral deal was struck, discussions leading to an agreement between the United States and Canada would follow suit. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm
The Court does not agree with the prosecution: If Congress were to take up the enterprise of criminalizing "undisclosed self-dealing by a public official or private employee," it would have to employ standards of sufficient definiteness and specificity to overcome due process concerns. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:35 pm
The case, Knick v. [read post]
