Search for: "Dean v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 1,457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
This was the first statutory recognition of any type of right of privacy in the United States. [read post]
16 May 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Payne is well known among those on death row in the United States because he was the plaintiff in an infamous Supreme Court case, Payne v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
The decision represents a crucial precedent that established the legal groundwork for the entrenchment of Jim Crow in the law of the United States, leading directly to the Courts adoption of separate but equal in Plessy v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This latter category included countries like Brazil, India, Poland, Ukraine, the Philippines, Turkey, and the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:02 am by Josh Blackman
I expect, and hope, that Dean Kagan becomes the new designated hitter for all CivPro cases. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Julian Ku
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that “United States Law…does not rule the world,” a phrase he first used in his opinion for the Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Aila Hoss
Supreme Court stated in Seminole Nation v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
Tatel, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and Steven R. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 6:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Just weeks after the Court’s decision in McGirt, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away, once again shifting the make-up of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the letter from this Wednesday states, “[a]fter reconsideration of the issue, it is now the position of the United States that the amended section 5000A is constitutional” and “it is also now the position of the United States that, if [the] Court nevertheless concludes that Section 5000A is unconstitutional, that provision is severable from the remainder of the ACA. [read post]