Search for: "Department of Revenue v. Public Service Co."
Results 221 - 240
of 342
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc v Tael One Partners Ltd, heard 17 November 2014. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service then intervened in an effort to get labor and management to agree. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
” The first impeachment count, 40 years ago, complained that the President attempted to use the Internal Revenue Service to harass his enemies. (1) He has, acting personally and through his subordinated and agents, endeavored to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposes not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the… [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Internal Revenue Service 13-1269Issue: Whether, contrary to the Federal Circuit's decision in USA Choice Internet Services, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
One of the reasons was that all signs out of Washington, D.C. pointed towards increasing federal regulation and oversight of cyber security for public and private companies, and particularly for those in the financial services sector. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:04 pm
The case that came the closest was Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It is only in the most serious and clearest of cases that these extensive reviews make feasible sense—as a matter of practicality and as a matter of efficient expenditure of taxpayer revenues. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It is only in the most serious and clearest of cases that these extensive reviews make feasible sense—as a matter of practicality and as a matter of efficient expenditure of taxpayer revenues. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Federal Communications Commission 13-1124Issue: (1) Whether the Court should overrule Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act… [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:50 pm
[the] defendants and other unindicted co-conspirators, conspired and agreed with each other to knowingly and intentionally defraudthe United States, for the purpose of impeding, impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful Government functions of the Internal Revenue Service ... [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Scott Paper Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
[i] Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Haliye v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am
R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:14 am
In El Greco Leather Products Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
But not having to make copayments or pay deductibles makes the services much more affordable.) [read post]
