Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 11:12 am
” Verde argued: (1) the parties compete directly; (2) effectiveness and cost are two of the most important factors in a purchase decision; and (3) the false representations were “critical” to effectiveness and cost. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:49 am
The decision in Qadan v Tehseldar, 2016 NY Slip Op 04036 [2d Dept May 25, 2016], provides no details concerning the underlying dissolution proceeding other than that the trial court determined that the two defendants committed oppressive actions against the plaintiff by excluding him from the business, and that it directed a buy-out of the plaintiff’s interest in the corporate defendants for the sum of about $45,000, with an alternate option for… [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
In a recent case a judgment holder claimed that their lien was superior to that of someone who alleged a fraudulent conveyance and recorded a lis pendens, though they did not claim a direct interest in the property. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 2:19 am
Further, interest was purchased by a competing French wine company, DBR (a direct competitor of the French winemaker). [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 12:02 pm
In 2011, plaintiffs decide to purchase a hyperbaric chamber from the clinic for in-home use. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:27 am
However, his submitted evidence failed to support such a claim, nor did his evidence manage to prove the claim that he had performed a reasonable duty of care when purchasing the goods. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
In this case, the plaintiff (Ascension) sought an injunction against a former employee (Underwood) for violating a non-compete provision in an employment agreement entered into around the same time Ascension purchased Underwood’s business under an asset purchase agreement. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:28 am
The agreement Following a lengthy conversation between the Cooks and a Springbok employee, the parties agreed to a price for the sale of the Cooks’ minerals and signed a letter agreement entitled “Offer to Purchase Mineral Interests in Lands”. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
The Section suggests that Article 1 may benefit from clarification that it applies only to actions in which the listed classes of plaintiffs have a direct interest in the contents of the resolutions, and not to derivative actions under Article 151 of the Company Law. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
The annuity purchaser in a structured settlement transaction is most often a qualified assignment company, to whom both the plaintiff settlement planner/broker and defense structured settlement broker have direct contact, yet the direct sales and solicitation contact of the product sold may be to other parties such as the plaintiff, the plaintiff lawyer, guardian ad litem, insurance adjuster or subscription insurance market leader. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:37 pm
Louis with executives of Monsanto and made an offer for Bayer to purchase the company. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
The purpose of considering such documents is "to prevent parties from surviving a motion to dismiss by artful pleading or by failing to attach relevant documents. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
In February 2011, DLT Federal Business Systems Corp (“DLT”) became a member of plaintiff’s membership program, which provides for third party companies interested in reselling plaintiff’s hardware and software. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The parties sought final approval of their proposed settlement in which the defendant – St. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:50 pm
Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), Walgreen, an “indirect” Remicade purchaser, would lack antitrust standing to assert claims against Janssen (…) In Illinois Brick, the Supreme Court created a “direct purchaser” rule for antitrust claims, “providing that only entities that purchase goods directly from alleged antitrust violators have statutory standing to bring a lawsuit for damages. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
First, prior to UC 31107’s offer, neither party had yet explicitly stated an interest in engaging in sexual activity with the other. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:52 am
” This requires dissemination either widely enough “to the relevant purchasing public” or “to a substantial portion of the plaintiff’s or defendant’s existing customer or client base. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Giving plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the purchase price was defined with reasonable certainty. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:19 am
However, Plaintiffs claim that users are more likely to get scammed on Defendants’ platform than to get an apartment. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
As the stipulation unambiguously calls for a determination of the fair market value of plaintiff's shares, plaintiff's contrary interpretation of the parties' intent must be rejected. [read post]
