Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2021, 10:28 am
” That concession by the plaintiffs seems unnecessary and against their own interests. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm
The court rejected various motions to intervene or add parties and rejected an alternate argument for the plaintiff’s standing. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
Moreover, the New York Bill provides that where there is direct evidence of dominance, plaintiffs need not plead a relevant market to state a claim. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
Through the RigUp app, the plaintiff was engaged by a third party company, Nova Mud. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:51 am
According to the court, the facts alleged established the existence of a unilateral contract between the parties. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:51 am
According to the court, the facts alleged established the existence of a unilateral contract between the parties. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:47 am
Second, the bill says that the new contributory claim doesn’t preempt other plaintiff claims, so trademark owners will still bring the standard statutory direct trademark infringement claim and common law contributory trademark claims (and dilution, false designation of origin, etc.). [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:05 am
Entrepreneur fell within the statute’s zone of interests—alleged lost sales and reputational injury. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:04 am
Characterizing VFB and Defendants as direct competitors because both make alcoholic beverages would dramatically expand the ‘zone of interest’ in which a plaintiff may sue for false advertising under the Lanham Act. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm
He writes: Plaintiff Natalia Marshall, while under the age of 21, wished to purchase a handgun from a federally licensed firearms dealer and sued to challenge the constitutionality of the federal laws and regulations which prohibited her from doing so while she was 18–20 years old. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The Appellate Division vacated the order and directed a genetic marker test. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
But trademark plaintiffs and judges are still partying like it’s 1999. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:15 am
Picket Fence argued that Zillow misleadingly failed to “disclose that interested shoppers would be directed to Premier Agents. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The justices said the state cannot limit political contributions to third-party groups because of the U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
“[A]n inference of a statement’s materiality based merely upon its falsity is neither so clear nor direct that it might support a burden-shifting presumption in a plaintiff’s favor. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 7:24 am
NO interest NO down payment NO minimum purchase. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
In this case, the plaintiff Tapia was not one of the parties to the settlement agreement. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
In this case, the plaintiff Tapia was not one of the parties to the settlement agreement. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:19 am
The plaintiff had his domicile in Bielefeld (Germany). [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Anyway, “[a]ny publication would be deemed an advertisement if the defendant had an interest in encouraging others to purchase it,” so that definition is too broad. [read post]