Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division" Results 221 - 240 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2017, 11:05 am by Kirk Jenkins
The Illinois Supreme Court agreed to decide that issue in the closing days of the November term, allowing a petition for leave to appeal in a certified question appeal from Division Five of the First District, Yarbrough v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
The fact that this is an electronic publication permits the user to locate information in the database by using key words and phrases.You may order your copy of The Section 207-a/c Case Book by sending your name, the name of your organization, your mailing address and telephone number, purchase order number, confirmation of your tax exempt status, if appropriate, and your e-mail address to:Publications@nycap.rr.comor you may mail your organization's purchase order form to:Public… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:32 pm by Benjamin Beaton
Hardison, for employers defending religious-accommodation claims under Title VII. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In addition, certain employees may reside at their employers’ homes including au pairs, household help, and home aides. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
62/09, The Queen, on the application of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry v Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency; the NHS Confederation (Employers) Company Ltd is potentially of great importance to at least one class of intellectual property owners -- the proprietary pharmaceutical sector. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:36 pm
” Since it was Justice Scalia that first announced, in Employment Division v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
She explained the situation, which led Robertson to request that she be reassigned from the task force back to the patrol division. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:49 am by Joy Waltemath
The district initiated an investigation, and several employees filed employment discrimination complaints with the New York State Division of Human Rights (DHR). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
The mandate, which employers must enforce, applies to roughly 84 million workers, covering virtually all employers with at least 100 employees. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
In fact, it has even broader implications than Masterpiece because in addition to the question that launched 95 amicus briefs in that case – whether bakers can be required to engage their expressive efforts in a manner contrary to their sincerely held religious beliefs – the Kleins ask the court to overrule its seminal 1990 decision in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Looking back on Roe, Justice Scalia pointed out in his (blistering) dissent in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 505 U.S. 833, (1992), that it was a cause of the deep division in our politics: Not only did Roe not, as the Court suggests, resolve the deeply divisive issue of abortion; it did more than anything to nourish it, by elevating it to the national level where it is infinitely more difficult to resolve. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]