Search for: "Doe 33"
Results 221 - 240
of 9,903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 6:50 am
They wanted 33 percent of the settlement fund, the usual contingency rate. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:41 pm
The post Does Legality Always Capture the Purpose? [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:15 am
However, Applicant submitted a new drawing depicting the mark as two words, and so the next question was whether, under Rule 2.72(b), the amended drawing "does not materially alter the mark. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:32 am
In addition, Judge Easterbrook’s opinion does seem to have been influenced significantly by the fact that the plaintiff in the case was really a seller of the investments involved, rather than a buyer, and therefore lacked a legal basis to assert a ’33 Act claim. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:21 pm
The post Tenancy Agreements 33 days of tips – Day 17 – Unfair Terms (2) appeared first on The Landlord Law Blog. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:03 am
See 33 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm
It does not affect only Quebec. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
It is well settled that the charging party "... bears the burden of proving the charged misconduct by a preponderance of the credible evidence.Finding that DOE proved that the employee browsed the internet for non-work-related matters for over 33 hours over a period of less than a month, failed to clock out for lunch, made false time-card entries, and spoke to a co-worker in a rude and insulting manner.Noting that DOE sought to impose the penalty of termination, the… [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
It is well settled that the charging party "... bears the burden of proving the charged misconduct by a preponderance of the credible evidence.Finding that DOE proved that the employee browsed the internet for non-work-related matters for over 33 hours over a period of less than a month, failed to clock out for lunch, made false time-card entries, and spoke to a co-worker in a rude and insulting manner.Noting that DOE sought to impose the penalty of termination, the… [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:41 pm
This reduction does not include lawyers who were asked to leave this year through our performance review process. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:45 am
Under current policy, there are six taxable income brackets – 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:18 pm
The s21 notice will entitle you to bring proceedings for possession if the tenant does not leave. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:14 am
Section 5 does not apply to common law tenancies. [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:36 am
It does not have a cap and trade program. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
” 11A Eugene McQuillin, The Law of Municipal Corporations § 33:2. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:35 am
Walsh does nothing to the panels except strip away Garfield and other characters â€â [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 3:19 am
"Given the nature of Applicant’s use on the specimens at issue, the prior registration does not convince us that #LAW functions as a service mark in the case before us. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 2:30 am
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and made an order requiring Dr Lehtimaki to vote in favour of the resolution on the basis that Dr Lehtimaki is a fiduciary when acting as a member of CIFF, the Court can direct Dr Lehtimaki to vote in favour of the resolution and s 217 of the Companies Act 2006 does not prevent the court from directing a member to vote. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 4:43 am
To whom does your internal audit head directly report to at your company: - CEO - 11% - CFO - 33% - General Counsel - 17% - Audit Committee Chair - 44% - Lead Director or Non-Executive Chair - 0% - Other - 6% - We don't have an internal audit head - 0% 2. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:06 am
Does s 217 allow the court to direct a member to exercise his discretion in a particular way? [read post]
