Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 -- 20" Results 221 - 240 of 8,860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  (And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
” The court additionally noted that, under F.R.C.P. 4(h)(1)(A), a corporation may be served “in the manner prescribed by Rule 4(e)(1) for serving an individual. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
does trading on goodwill mean materiality? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Congress is allowed to say (as it often does) that something can be excluded from gross income or deducted when computing taxable income, but that does not mean that the exclusion or deduction was not income in the first place. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Moab Partners LP,[1] a closely followed case that ought to address whether a purported failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
In the wave of litigation that followed, bump stock owners challenged the ATF’s interpretation and argued that, given the statutes’ criminal implications, the rule of lenity required that any ambiguity in the NFA and GCA should be resolved in the defendant’s favor. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:53 am by Ty Stimpson
Vehicle D if there were enough coverage, could recover 80% of its damages (100% – 20% fault), so $40,000.Considering the Policy Limits:Vehicle A’s insurance has a limit of $60,000. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:53 am by Ty Stimpson
Vehicle D if there were enough coverage, could recover 80% of its damages (100% – 20% fault), so $40,000.Considering the Policy Limits:Vehicle A’s insurance has a limit of $60,000. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Gray v Motor Accident Commission (1998): Does the Criminal Punishment of the Defendant Bar Exemplary Damages? [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm by Guest Author
Much like the defenders of HB20, the defenders of the right-of-reply law argued that “[t]he result of these vast changes has been to place in a few hands the power to inform the American people and shape public opinion. [read post]