Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 221 - 240
of 8,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Defendant moved by notice of motion dated April 20, 2016, to dismiss the action based upon the plaintiffs failure to serve a complaint in accordance with CPLR 3012(b). [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:19 pm
20. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:47 pm
The defendant explained that she did not tell Brooks that she had driven 20 minutes earlier and instead was confused by Brooks’ question. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:11 am
September 20, 2011) [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:48 pm
A First Degree Misdemeanor is punishable by a maximum of 1 year jail, 1 year probation, and/or $1,000 fine. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:02 pm
The Court also upheld admission of testimony from defendant’s daughter concerning his sexual assault on her more than 20 years prior to the trial pursuant to FRE 414.Robert L.AbellZach Turpin [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
If the purpose of the PCR petition is “to correct an illegal sentence,” or if the defendant can show that the failure to file within five years “was due to the defendant’s excusable neglect,” the five-year deadline does not apply. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:30 am
July 20, 2011) (unpublished)*: Furthermore, given its finding that there was a zoning ordinance violation, the County's order requiring the Jensens to schedule inspection to confirm abatement is reasonable and does not present a Fourth Amendment violation. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
Their mere use of the devices thus fails to establish defendants' knowledge of inaccuracy and, taken individually, does not prove scienter. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 11:17 am
However, it does reflect how a punitive damage award can substantially increase the amount one is compensated. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 12:39 am
(Aida Amoako) The post Nonprofit Tweets of the Week – 9/4/20 appeared first on Nonprofit Law Blog. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 6:30 am
LEXIS 1352 (November 20, 2009) [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:41 am
October 20, 2010)*: By failing to respond to defendant’s argument that the computer was outside the scope of the warrant, the government “ha[s] essentially conceded the point”. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:10 am
Abbott, 560 U.S. 1, 9 (2010). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:08 am
The district forced him to defend charges concerning events that occurred more than 20 years ago, which left him unable to defend himself in violation of his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment; and 2. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 8:01 am
Two of these latest complaints include allegations against 20 separate as-yet-unidentified Defendants, while the third lists 16 new Defendants. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:45 am
June 20, 2012). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:34 am
1. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
§ 14501(c)(1), and therefore unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 12:38 pm
A Kings Criminal Lawyer said that, the defendant, charged with Attempted Assault in the Third Degree (PL §110/120.00[1]), moves to dismiss the superseding information pursuant to CPL 170.35(1)(a) for facial insufficiency. [read post]
