Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-10, Inclusive" Results 221 - 240 of 761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2017, 6:21 pm by LundgrenJohnson
In assault-harm cases, a prosecutor does not need to show that a defendant had the specific-intent to cause harm. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:21 pm by LundgrenJohnson
In assault-harm cases, a prosecutor does not need to show that a defendant had the specific-intent to cause harm. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:26 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The media organisations tend to reject conflict-law rules n°1-2-4, blaming their lack of predictability for the defendant, and advocate the use of connecting factor n°3. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:30 pm
If the answer to question (2) is in the negative, may the fact that the defendant participates in the proceedings before a court which otherwise under the Regulation does not have jurisdiction in a case concerning insurance, be regarded as an agreement on jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the Regulation? [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:37 pm
Thus, as is typically the case with a QTIP trust, the SK Trust is responsible for the estate taxes attributable to its inclusion in the decedent's estate. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
At the December 15 meeting, Yick presented Shimunov with a statement regarding the loss for his review and signature and, despite numerous requests for the signed document, Shimunov did not sign the statement until May 29, 2008, for inclusion in plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
"It is becoming increasingly clear that the current economic order and business models are not fit for the purpose of achieving inclusive, equitable and sustainable development. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am by Giles Peaker
Disability Discrimination Ms P defended and counterclaimed for discrimination under section 15 Equality Act 2010: (1) A person (A) discriminates against a disabled person (B) if— (a) A treats B unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of B’s disability, and (b) A cannot show that the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if A shows that A did not know, and could not… [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Construed favorably to plaintiffs, the ad here was the sign “buy 10 gallons of fuel, get a voucher for a free lift ticket! [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:14 pm
  Common sense suggests that even a properly designed and executed keyword search may prove to be over-inclusive or under-inclusive, resulting in the identification of documents as privileged which are not, and non-privileged which, in fact, are. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 2:18 am by Kevin LaCroix
’33 Act Allegations: After controlling for the presence of underwriter defendants and controlling for other factors, the inclusion of ’33 Act claims does not result in a statistically significant increase in settlement amounts. [read post]