Search for: "Doe v. Internet Brands, Inc."
Results 221 - 240
of 617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2016, 10:11 am
The court cites the First Circuit’s ruling in Doe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:14 pm
Contrast with Doe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:54 am
See, e.g., 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 515 (2009). [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:10 am
IMS Health, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
Sarah Feingold, Etsy, Inc.: Free speech—we need the internet as it is, doing pretty well. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
John is the President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
* Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe caseThis is about the Court of Justice of the European Union's (CJEU) decision in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM [Case C‑396/15 P], another trade mark case upon parallel stripes and shoes. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Brand X Internet Services (2005) In setting the Phase II national performance standards and providing for site-specific cost-benefit variances, the EPA relied on its view that § 1326(b)’s “best technology available” standard permits consideration of the technology’s costs, and of the relationship between those costs and the environmental benefits produced. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 11:11 am
The case is Kendall Jenner Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:17 am
Baidu. * Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Ontario CA in Lilydale v Meyn. https://t.co/X4XPniy6YF -> Duffy v Google Inc (No 2), Damages of Aus$100,000 awarded against Google for publication of defamatory snippets https://t.co/y3RrGSAJvF -> France: Aïcha, Court of Cassation of France, First Civil Law Chamber, 14-11944, 30 September 2015 https://t.co/nTXzxdDNLX -> Premier League Expands UK Pirate Site Blockades https://t.co/Kg7JE82ROR -> Oracle Discovery Bid In $1B Google IP Row Ripped By Judge… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
In practical terms, this means that, just as it does for financial reporting, every corporate board should: Create a cybersecurity committee (just like its audit committee); Engage an independent cybersecurity firm to conduct an annual cybersecurity audit (just like an independent accounting firm conducts and signs off on an annual financial audit); and Add cybersecurity expertise and knowledge to the board (sitting right beside the board’s accounting and financial… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., Civ. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
From an IP angle, of course.* Linking, copyright and ancillary rights: what does the Commission intend to do? [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
The Stockholm District Court does not appear to think so. [read post]
