Search for: "Does 1-215"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
The People argued that because Defendant admitted growing marijuana for at least four other people, in addition to himself, and because as a matter of law he does not qualify as a primary caregiver for the only two qualified patients he identified at trial. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
Margolis, 215 Conn. 408, 416 n. 6, 576 A.2d 489 (1990). [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:26 am
The new laws legalize sitting and camping in public as long as it does not endanger the health or safety of the homeless person or others. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:50 am
The new ordinance does allow the medicinal plant to be grown indoors in a select few industrial areas. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
“Hey Siri, what does ‘independent’ mean? [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 1:01 pm
McKim, 215 S.W.3d at 787.If DUI is not a diversion-eligible offense, how does pretrial diversion ever apply to a DUI case? [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 1:19 pm
But, the decision does have a point on the wording of s.213 HA 2004. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
If it does, should law enforcement access be the primary concern? [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:01 am
I therefore hereby proclaim the following: Section 1. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 4:18 am
That conclusion, likely not too shocking to anyone, is the following: less conventional marks remain (very) difficult to register.The rise of the substantial value groundOne issue is the growing relevance of the absolute ground for refusal/invalidity concerning signs that consist exclusively of a shape or another characteristic that gives substantial value to the goods (Article 7(1)(e)(iii) EUTMR/4(1)(e)(iii) EUTMD).Such a ground, considered quite niche if not altogether… [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:55 am
The whole is subject to the Act respecting Access to documents held by public bodies and the Protection of personal information (new section 215). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:33 am
McCoy Hilliard & Parks, 346 N.C. 650, 660, 488 S.E.2d 215, 220-21 (1997). [read post]
1 May 2013, 11:42 am
Plaintiffs’ action challenged the EIR for a development project, but was filed 3 calendar days and 1 business day after the 30-day statute of limitations of Public Resources Code § 21167 had expired because its attorney service failed to arrive at the courthouse in time to file on the deadline date. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 12:16 am
CV-10-0172-PR (AZ 1/18/11). [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
The Supreme Court held that it does. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
— (1) INITIAL REVIEW AND ADJUSTMENT. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
In New Jersey, the Judge does not have to rule that you were drunk. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
THE LOANOn May 1, 2002, Bank One, N.A. entered into a loan-purchase agreement with The First Marblehead Corporation (First Marblehead) "for loans that were originated under Bank One's . . . [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:09 am
” 750 ILCS 5/504(b-1)(1)(A) Does this perfectly accommodate each party’s new tax liabilities or lack thereof? [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:45 am
Supp. 2d 215, 236-37 (E.D.N.Y. 2013) (citing cases); KeySpan Gas E. [read post]
