Search for: "Does I & II"
Results 221 - 240
of 23,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
TNutz does business via its own website and an eBay store. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:54 pm
You've named 18 so far, according to something I read in Foreign Policy. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
This is Part II of our newest installment in the "Ask the Author" series; yesterday’s Part I is here. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 2:53 pm
Most democracies in the world reject this model, and in a paper that I'm now researching I will examine... [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
In my view, the Constitution does not dictate the exact form of that primacy. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:00 pm
Although repealed, the „old” Regulation does not completely loose its relevance. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 3:04 am
Where does this leave us? [read post]
15 Oct 2003, 2:57 pm
On an earlier post, I commented on the return of the ASP model. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:16 am
Why Did the Pre-Trial Chamber II Grant the OTP’s Request? [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm
Part II provides an in-depth account of the habeas corpus proceedings in the House of Lords in the reign of James I, while Part III does the same for the habeas corpus proceedings in the House of Commons during the reign.The Article concludes with a detailed discussion of the three major changes this work mandates in our understanding of English legal history. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:18 am
Parts II and III conclusively demonstrate that in the reign of James I the High Court of Parliament at times functioned as the High Habeas Court of Parliament. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 11:33 pm
Let's see whether the judiciary prevails, but if it does, then it means that the whole range of policies based on reservation will be slowed down and frankly speaking I think it's one of the few corrections to what liberalisation is doing to societies these days. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:01 am
No Simple Victory: World War II in Europe, 1939-1945 is a book about which my husband and I have fairly strong disagreement. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:34 am
Or does it leave difficult tax hikes to be implemented by future presidents? [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 10:57 am
The Commissioner said: “We intend to launch the adoption process for the new clauses in the coming months and I hope finalise it by the end of this year”. [read post]
13 Feb 2006, 12:23 pm
I have no good answer.)Having laid out the burdens of proof, the Charles II court went on to evaluate what "good faith" means for purposes of 362(c)(3). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
IRC 4966 defines donor advised funds as a fund or account: (i) which is separately identified by reference to contributions of a donor or donors, (ii) which is owned and controlled by a sponsoring organization, and (iii) with respect to... [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am
One way to operationalize this distinction is to note that the law of armed conflict does not authorize or permit racial roundups like the World War II internment of Japanese-Americans, but it does authorize or at least permit detention of captured combatants for the duration of hostilities. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
The statutory structure that governs transfer does not allow for ordering transfer based on consent. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 5:02 am
Liu wrote a series of four installments (originally published in China Intellectual Property, 20:44-51, 2007) about the amendment of the Chinese patent law that will probably be ready in 2008.Read here Mr Liu and Ms Liu's 'Waves of Changes in Chinese Patent Law and Regulations',Part I here;Part II here;Part III here;Part IV here.Head tip to Philip Brook of Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates whose blog has been chosen by the new Patent Law Center of… [read post]
