Search for: "Du Pont v. Du Pont"
Results 221 - 240
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
Earnhardt v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:47 am
" Compare Holmes Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:03 pm
” E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:03 pm
” E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 3:10 am
Luigi Lavazza S.p.A. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 3:37 pm
Cir. 2003) and Jacobs v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:13 am
Finding that the first and second du Pont factors weigh in opposer's favor, the Board sustained the opposition. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 3:00 am
Bhd v Seng Kong Shutter Industries Sdn. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:06 pm
See Apple Computer v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:08 am
Vitasoy International Holdings Limited v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:37 pm
Great White Shark Enterprises, Inc.. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
The Du Pont factors that are relevant to the record must be examined. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 3:15 am
Dan Foam ApS v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm
The Board evaluated whether there was a likelihood of confusion by looking at the thirteen factors identified in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (C.C.P.A. 1973). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 2:49 am
Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely, and it sustained the opposition. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 4:37 am
Precedential No. 20: 13th du Pont Factor Yields TTAB 2(d) ReversalTTAB Test: Which One of These Four Section 2(d) Refusals Was Reversed? [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
The North Face Apparel Corp. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:03 am
Thus this du Pont factor favored Plaintiff. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
So this du Pont factor was deemed neutral. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 am
" Given the close similarity between applicant's marks and the cited typed mark TWA, this first du Pont factor weighed heavily against applicant. [read post]
