Search for: "EASTERN EXPRESS v. UNITED STATES" Results 221 - 240 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm by The Law Blogger
Last August, we blogged about the most recent such case: Carpenter v United States.Carpenter was summarized in our post:Tim Carpenter was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for a series of armed robberies in Detroit and across Northern Ohio. [read post]
The nation asserts that the city lacks criminal jurisdiction over Native Americans on the tribe’s lands without express congressional authorization, as per the 2020 US Supreme Court case McGirt v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:34 am by Ben
It would be very dangerous to deny relief in this instance”.There were no representatives of either Equustek or the Canadian Supreme Court in attendance, and Judge Edward Davila agreed with Google’s request for a preliminary injunction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
 According to TrollTracker (click here for TrollTracker’s year end filing analysis), the Eastern District of Texas was first with 364 filings, more than 2.5 times the Northern District’s filings. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Ben
The action was filed with the United States District Court of New Mexico.In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by Jenny Gesley
An automatic restoration might not have been in their interest or compromised citizenship or property rights in another country, because of the designation of Germany as an “enemy state” during the Second World War by the United Nations. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
"Assigned to this significant forfeiture case is Chief Judge Thomas Hogan, which is captioned of United States of America v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:06 am by Phil Dixon
Given the confluence of cases in which the Eastern District of North Carolina United States Attorney’s Office has breached its discovery standards, it appears a re-evaluation [of its discovery standards] is in order. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 6:55 am
Misappropriation of Trade Secrets  Illinois Law Wisconsin Law    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]