Search for: "EEOC v. May and Co., Inc."
Results 221 - 240
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2011, 6:35 am
Maatman, Jr. and Chris Palamountain Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
Contra, EEOC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
Under the prior standard imposed by the PDA and interpreted by the Supreme Court in Young v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:16 pm
In Nash v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Cudd Pressure Control, Inc., No. 07-6199 (Nov. 19, 2008)(Unpublished)Reversing dismissal of disability/discharge complaint, finding that EEOC charge was timely under Holowecki11th CircuitCordero v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:52 pm
[1] Cuno, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
EEOC, Compliance Manual § 12-I(A)(2) (citing, inter alia, Adeyeye v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
EEOC. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:58 am
According to a lawsuit filed (EEOC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:38 am
For example, the Fourth Circuit recently affirmed summary judgment for an employer that would have had to incur more than a de minimus cost to accommodate a dump truck driver’s absences for his Saturday Sabbath observance (EEOC v Thompson Contracting, Grading, Paving, and Utilities, Inc, 4th Cir 2012). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:46 pm
Duke Power Co. (1971) and Albemarle Paper Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Osram Sylvania, Inc.2nd Cir.Comparators In Employment Discrimination Case Must Be SimilarBillue v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:05 pm
Christiansburg, 434 U.S. at 421-22; see also Sensations, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Green v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am
Green v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Green v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
” On the second question, the appeals court pointed out that the WLAD is at least as broad as the ADA, and under the appellate court’s recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
The summary of rights eventually sent to applicants was also purportedly outdated (Marcum v Dolgencorp, Inc dba Dollar General). [read post]
