Search for: "EPA v. California"
Results 221 - 240
of 680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 2:47 pm
Quoting Amchem Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
§ 9622(e)(6) of CERCLA before engaging in remedial action, even if the EPA has never ordered the landowner to pay for a cleanup; and (3) whether CERCLA pre-empts state common-law claims for restoration that seek cleanup remedies that conflict with EPA-ordered remedies. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:55 am
EPA is not applicable here because this case is not addressing a procedural right. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Department of Education, EPA, U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:46 am
The State of California lists the glyphosate but the US Environmental Protection Agency [US EPA] does not. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
On March 22nd, Professor Baker was the featured speaker at the Northern California Association of Law Libraries’ Spring Institute in San Francisco, California. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
Most notably and most recently, the California Supreme Court ruled for the defense in O’Neil v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
” The government advises that the court should give the parties “the benefit of the EPA’s views before any brief on the merits is due. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 9:00 am
On January 15, the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in Arconic, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 12:25 pm
Plaintiffs in Kassman v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 2:58 am
Oral argument in the Knick v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:05 pm
See Bridewell-Sledge, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 12:30 pm
Plaintiffs: Which discriminates against out-of-state fuels and overrides an EPA rule. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Recently, seventeen states urged the Court to use California Sea Urchin Commission v. [read post]
