Search for: "Eddings v. Oklahoma"
Results 221 - 240
of 359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 10:48 am
I Dig Texas, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:59 pm
Ohio and Eddings v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:06 am
Earlier this year, after the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of fee-shifting bylaws in the case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
As pointed out yesterday in an important Washington Post op-ed by Prof. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
An Oklahoma jury has ordered a former state legislator to pay $4.3 million to an insurance company in a defamation case. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:54 am
In ,Robison v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:54 am
In ,Robison v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Huff v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
Oklahoma requires resentencing. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice 12-1094Issue: Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in holding – without analysis or discussion – that the Oklahoma law requiring that abortion-inducing drugs be administered according to the protocol described on the drugs’ FDA-approved labels is facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
There are six such petitioner organizations: two offer such plans to their employees (Oklahoma Wesleyan University and Priests for Life); another offers such a plan to its students (Southern Nazarene University); and the other three offer insured plans to both their employees and students (Catholic University, Geneva College, and Oklahoma Baptist University). [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Craig v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am
Gross, the challenge to Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocol, that in his view draw an analogy between death penalty opponents and terrorists. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am
” At ACSblog, Charlotte Garden discusses Friedrichs v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm
See Tanaka v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 2:20 pm
They have not enforced the Fourteenth Amendment; they have ‘demean[ed]…the democratic process. [read post]
