Search for: "English v. Marshall" Results 221 - 240 of 310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Black, A Constitutional Faith (1968) Certain other works dealt with obscure matters or issues of foreign law, such as the following: John Marshall Harlan, Manning the Dikes; Some Comments on the Statutory Certiorari Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Statement Practice of the Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, A Selective Survey of English Language Studies on Scandinavian Law (1970) Stephen G. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm by Dan Ernst
Nabrit did an extended interview for an oral history project led by then-University of Virginia English professor William Elwood.Cigar in hand, Nabrit - a former NAACP lawyer who worked with Thurgood Marshall and others to fight segregation - recalled the series of legal challenges both before and after the landmark Brown v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:51 am by Gerard Magliocca
This week in my Admiralty class I taught my favorite case–Moragne v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
However, the sub-continental Superior Courts have invalidated Acts of Parliaments following principles of constitutional law as applied in the famous decision by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury Vs Madison[7] . [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
K 3943 M37 2010 Competition regulation and policy at the World Trade Organisation / Fiona Marshall. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:31 am by Richard A. Epstein
  Once again, the near plaintive objection of Justice Thomas affirms our faith in the clarity of the English language. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Brennan and Marshall said the death penalty was flatly unconstitutional and so voted repeatedly. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 2:22 pm
Grounded on solid legal precedent -- with English common law, a landmark U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am by Bill Merkel
   Jefferson’s retirement letters to Madison belabor the theme of constitutional threats and violations at the hands of Marshall, but the reader soon discovers that the constitutional touchstone Jefferson refers to in measuring Marshall’s constitutional infidelity is neither the seven articles written in 1787 nor Bill of Rights written in 1789, but rather a set of Whiggish principles and conventions respecting legislative supremacy that crystallized during the… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm by Stephen Wermiel
  In terms of potential impact, the case of Sorrell v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
  We posted a case comment on this and Rosalind English’s survey of the other coverage. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
He did his undergraduate work in mathematics at Marshall University and studied law at the University of Michigan. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am by Audrey Ah-Kan, Olswang
Since Shell UK Ltd & Ors v Total UK Ltd & Or (a case concerning the Buncefield oil terminal fire, which was due to be heard from 5 to 7 April 2011) has now been settled, the Supreme Court will instead hear the appeal in Jivraj v Hashwani on 6 and 7 April 2011. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm by Jon
That principle was subverted by Justice Marshal in McCulloch v. [read post]