Search for: "Epstein v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 8:41 am by Geoffrey Stone
The eighteen cases are, in chronological order, United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
 Lynn said that the webinar would cover the:  Overview and analysis of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Decision. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am by Conor McEvily
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by Ezra Rosser
The University of Chicago Law Review has published articles from the “Understanding Education in the United States: Its Legal and Social Implications Symposium. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:58 am by Taryn Rucinski
Journal of the Supreme Court of the United States The Journal of the Supreme Court of the United States contains the “official minutes” of the Court. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery –… [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:26 pm by FDABlog HPM
  FDA should not interpret the statute in a way that would result in the imposition of large liabilities on the United States and should therefore apply the BPCIA prospectively only. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:04 pm by Ilya Somin
To avert that evasion, the United States Supreme Court held in 1893 that in condemnation cases, “the compensation must be a full and perfect equivalent for the property taken. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether purposefully flooding land is a Fifth Amendment taking. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:23 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Justice Alito asked recently in another case, "...if you related the facts of this case as they come to us to an ordinary homeowner, don’t you think most ordinary homeowners would say this kind of thing can’t happen in the United States? [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm by Andrew Koppelman
” (15) But the brief also has so many citations to United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:20 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" asks @dorfonlaw pjblack.me/zjl1Ap #lwb242 the fascinating story behind the case: "Lawrence v Texas: How Laws Against Sodomy Became Unconstitutional" pjblack.me/yW6J9C yay! [read post]