Search for: "FEDERAL CONTRACTING, INC. v. USA" Results 221 - 240 of 534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by MOTP
Leach's subcontractors, Power Design, Inc. and Atlas Comfort Systems USA, LLC[3] (collectively, the Subcontractors); and (3) an engineering contractor, CHP & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc., and its employee Mark Janneck (collectively, the Engineers).[4] Sapphire, in turn, promptly amended its petition to name these parties as defendants, alleging that their negligence and contractual breaches resulted in construction defects that caused the condominium… [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm by Law Lady
Costs -- Section 57.105 does not provide mechanism for recovering costs GRAND RESERVE AT TAMPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and BUSINESS LAW GROUP, P.A., Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Finding that none of defendant's claims have merit, we affirm the the district court's judgment. 08a0012p.06 USA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Leach's subcontractors, Power Design, Inc. and Atlas Comfort Systems USA, LLC[3] (collectively, the Subcontractors); and (3) an engineering contractor, CHP & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc., and its employee Mark Janneck (collectively, the Engineers).[4] Sapphire, in turn, promptly amended its petition to name these parties as defendants, alleging that their negligence and contractual breaches resulted in construction defects that caused the condominium… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
AnimalFeeds alleged that Stolt-Nielsen, S.A., Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group Ltd., Odfjell ASA, Odfjell Seachem AS, Odfjell USA, Inc., Jo Tankers, BV, Jo Tankers, Inc. and Tokyo Marine Co. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm by Scott Dodson
  In Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 2:54 pm by Scott McKeown
In its recent non-precedential opinion in Olaplex, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 4:57 am by Bexis
  The issue accepted by the Court is:Whether, in the absence of a private right of action to enforce a statute, federal courts have the federal common law authority to confer a private right of action simply because the statutory requirement sought to be enforced is embodied in a contract. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Mississippi, the Court made it easier for courts to sentence persons under age 18 to life without parole when they commit homicide, and in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]