Search for: "FISH v. LACK" Results 221 - 240 of 883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2013, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee, however, testified that while she served as the External Affairs ARD, the deputy regional director regularly criticized her for her lack of specific leadership skills and suggested that she read leadership books and attend leadership training. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm by Gabriel Chin
Nevertheless, as the briefs in Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 3:43 am
Supreme Court has granted certiorari in National Association of Home Builders v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:47 pm by Steve Davies
From DOE's Uranium Leasing Program page In a footnote, Martinez distinguished the decision in The Wilderness Society v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Department of Fish & Wildlife and California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:09 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The Legislature was aware that establishing a broad right to discovery might permit parties lacking any valid cause of action to engage in “fishing expedition[s],” to a defendant’s inevitable annoyance. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
& Cari Baermann Fifty years ago, Judge Robert Belloni handed down a historic treaty fishing rights case in Sohappy v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The first case concerns which party must demonstrate the existence of "retaliatory intent" (or lack thereof) for whistleblower claims under Sarbanes-Oxley, and the latter concerns the scope of the National Marine Fisheries Service's authority to impose requirements on fishing vessels. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
January 12, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Breitling SA, Serial No. 879152818 [section 2(d) refusal of MERLIN for "timepieces and chronometric instruments" in view of the identical mark registered for various articles of clothing].January 17, 2017, 2016 - 11 AM: Patriot National Insurance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rather, the invoices show that plaintiffs were billed for work pertaining to communications with the court, client, and subsequent counsel, [*2]which did not toll the statute of limitations (see Rupolo v Fish, 87 AD3d 684, 685 [2d Dept 2011]). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:35 am
Plus, see if you won't use this quote (from footnote seven) as well the next time you want an extension to go fishing with your friend -- or simply enjoy the holidays -- rather than filing an opposition:  "[Counsel's] lack of availability due to a previously planned trip is a reasonable basis for seeking an extension of time. . . . [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
California Department of Fish and Game and Sierra Club v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Specifically, I explained what had happened in O’Connor et al v. [read post]