Search for: "Falls v. Falls"
Results 221 - 240
of 34,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2020, 8:28 am
The case is Aday et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:14 am
In Sowell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:56 am
Facts: This case (Pearson v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 6:29 pm
The recent case Dunn v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:15 am
Additional Resources: Barnwell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:47 am
Slipping and falling as the result of an undetectable unknown substance on road constitutes an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law Sammon v DiNapoli, 2012 NY Slip Op 05587, Appellate Division, Third Department City of Yonkers Firefighter Michael M. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 11:15 am
Facts: This case (Ackerman et al v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm
The 1934 Supreme Court case of Home Building and Loan v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:28 pm
Suddarth v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Additional Resources: Piotrowski v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:32 am
In the case, Pipkin v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:32 am
In the case, Pipkin v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
From a critical perspective, NSSTA's 2009 Fall Educational Conference represented a series of "missed opportunities". [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:26 am
Trip and fall cases are interesting because of two competing defenses:1. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 1:07 pm
In today’s case (Dudas v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:55 pm
Harrison v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:43 am
Vineyard Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 11:50 am
A police officer's fall while chasing a suspect was not an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law Matter of Melendez v New York State Comptroller, 2008 NY Slip Op 06921, decided on September 18, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentRobert Melendez, a police officer serving with the Village of Freeport Police Department in Nassau County, was injured after tripping over a snow bank while chasing two suspects. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
See Harrison v. [read post]
