Search for: "Favors v. USA"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
In Largo Legacy Group, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:28 am
Miller & Lux, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 5:10 am
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. wrote the unanimous decision in favor of the agency. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:38 pm
The case, Nestle v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 7:56 am
It did so, in large part, due to the California Court of Appeal’s decision in Huff v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
As an example, a recent district court case, Robert Garcia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
Pix Credit: U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
” Regarding undercapitalization, that factor indeed provides at least prima facie weight in favor of finding that Curaden USA was a “mere instrumentality” of Curaden AG because Curaden USA was not profitable, and the evidence is unclear as to what extent Curaden USA paid Curaden AG for the products it purchased. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:03 am
From Burke v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 2:54 pm
In its recent non-precedential opinion in Olaplex, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:29 am
This would not be enough, however, for a reasonable jury to find in its favor, given the lack of sufficient evidence regarding sales success, advertising expenditures, and other factors relating to secondary meaning (The Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 8:51 am
· Responder · 11 h Briana Umilde Aguilar Mishell Cabrera usa la cabeza porfa. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 8:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
In Marquette Nat’l Bank of Minneapolis v. [read post]
