Search for: "Feldman v. Feldman" Results 221 - 240 of 1,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed in Time, Tim Shriver, the chairman of the Special Olympics, weighs in on Moore v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm by Kalvis Golde
This morning the court issued an opinion in Kisor v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
Contents include:Case CommentsHans van Houtte & Bridie McAsey, Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims Andrea Marco Steingruber, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Consent in Large-scale Arbitration Proceedings Céline Lévesque, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: The Definition of Investment Samuel Wordsworth, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Pre-conditions to… [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am by Joel R. Brandes
In White v White, 2012 WL 3041660 (S.D.N.Y.) pro se Plaintiff Keith White brought an action against his ex-wife Gabriela White under the Hague Convention, seeking the return of the parties' son S. to Keith and repayment of monies that Keith paid to Gabriela since 2005. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:51 pm
Feldman adds that “some speculated” that Kennedy’s liberal vote in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm by scanner1
KANTOROWICZ and CHARLOTTE KANTOROWICZ; JAMES FELDMAN and COURTNEY FELDMAN; DAVID P. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant attorney’s argument that plaintiffs’ papers in opposition to his motion to dismiss lacked evidentiary value because the annexed affidavits were notarized by the third-party defendant attorney (Feldman) and Feldman only submitted affirmations rather than affidavits, is unavailing. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:40 am
It was dreamed up by an enterprising journalist who tracked down the plaintiffs and got the details of their life situations," writes lawprof Noah Feldman in "How the Supreme Court Could Save Obamacare Again. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:17 am by Ted Frank
Berry sued in federal court, arguing that the disciplinary rule was facially unconstitutional because it, inter alia, barred "reckless truths," true statements made with reckless disregard for their truth or falsity; the district court held the rule was not subject to a facial challenge, and that Rooker-Feldman barred a collateral attack on the actual discipline itself. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman points out several notable ways in which the new grants add to the “emerging picture” of the next term. [read post]