Search for: "First v. Armes (1983)" Results 221 - 240 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
For purposes of this subsection, "emergency services personnel" shall include, but not be limited to, any paid or volunteer fireman, any person engaged in emergency first-aid or medical services and any law enforcement officer. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
Cooper, 16-166); yet another Armed Career Criminal Act case (Khoury v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The officers rolled McKinney onto his stomach, but he refused to expose his right arm. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 4:41 am by Susan Brenner
Deputy Shine did not notice any physical injuries at first, but later that day she noticed a bruise on Deanna's arm. . . . [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
First, the court concluded that Porter’s counsel was clearly deficient because he failed to perform almost any investigation into Porter’s background for mitigating evidence. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:45 am by Eugene Volokh
§1983, was not prominent until the mid-20th century. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Vasbinder, No. 06-2381 Grant of a habeas petition challenging a conviction and sentence for first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony is reversed as petitioner did not satisfy the gateway requirements for excusing a time-barred claim. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Ct. 2567 (2011), which is why Bartlettwas first in line after Mensing was decided), but rather because the plaintiff’s treating physician never read the defendant’s package insert:[The prescriber] admitted at his deposition that he never reviewed [defendant’s generic drug] label before treating [plaintiff] and that “nothing about it influenced [his] prescribing of the drug” or what he told [plaintiff] about it. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:42 am by admin
The Supreme Court first recognized this narrow exception to the warrant requirement in Terry v. [read post]