Search for: "Fitch v. Fitch"
Results 221 - 240
of 426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
" (Mossoff, at 5) (quoting NGS American, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:45 pm
For the leading modern court opinion on whether the tort should be retained, see Fitch v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 4:27 pm
California Public Employees' Retirement System v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
" Parallel Networks, LLC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:43 am
On March 11, 2010, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court decision permitting an insured to shift the burden of primary coverage for various securities-related claims to its previous insurer by purchasing an extended reporting period (ERP) and adding an endorsement to its current primary policy making it specifically excess of the prior policy.In Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:43 am
On March 11, 2010, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court decision permitting an insured to shift the burden of primary coverage for various securities-related claims to its previous insurer by purchasing an extended reporting period (ERP) and adding an endorsement to its current primary policy making it specifically excess of the prior policy.In Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 1:15 am
Mylan, upholding Marcus Smith J.'s decision to deny an interim injunction against a generic company which launched at risk.Fellow GuestKat Rose Hughes reported on the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Regeneron v Kymab, which found Regeneron's patents to be invalid for insufficiency, overturning the Court of Appeal decision and confirming the UK's strong sufficiency requirement.Trade MarksPermaKat Neil J. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 2:02 am
Haritatos v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 1:04 pm
The case was Taylor v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Rumsfeld [16] and Burt v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:30 pm
Marshall also considered Levi Strauss v Abercrombie & Fitch and the degree of similarity which was needed in order to establish confusion. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:37 am
In a more notable case, a judge ruled against Strauss after it claimed Abercrombie & Fitch had allegedly violated its trademarks. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:32 pm
See, e.g., Kasap v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
See, e.g., Kasap v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 11:20 pm
That case, Jones v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
§1064(3)).With arbitrary or fanciful marks, the word used as trade mark has its own meaning and it therefore has its own place in language (the Ninth Cirucit in this case used the example of the trade mark IVORY, which is a trade mark for soap but also is the material of the tusks of elephants Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
Next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Tomorrow the Court will hear oral arguments in King v. [read post]
