Search for: "Fox v. FCC" Results 221 - 240 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (The case is Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:17 pm
Specifically, the Circuit Court's ruling in Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:10 am by val_kimber
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT’L UNION 10-1293 FCC, ET AL. v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 9:01 pm
Fox Television Stations (07-582), Vaden v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:34 am
Well, I didn’t really enjoy some of the conclusions, but the writing is good Anyway, today’s exciting legal news is that the same court has accepted Fox v FCC (a challenge to the FCC’s new policy towards ‘fleeting’ expletives*), an appeal by the FCC (petition here) from the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeal’s finding that the new policy violated US administrative law (’arbitrary and… [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:04 am
The expletives ruling was in FCC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:15 am by Walter Olson
“New Puerto Rico law threatens jail time for spreading ‘false information’ about COVID-19” [Committee to Protect Journalists, earlier] Freedom for publishers and platforms to associate with whomever they want permits them to exclude quackery and health misinformation, and that’s a feature not a bug [Matthew Feeney] It takes the FCC all of one day to reject petition from absurdly named pressure group Free Press demanding broadcast limits on statements by Trump… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
The Court has released the opinion in FCC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:00 am by Nathan Koppel
(Here’s a SCOTUSblog overview of the FCC v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/7e8CRTEkIT -> Identity not disclosed for privacy reasons DIGITAL MUSIC NEWS LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:54 am by Kent Scheidegger
In a more unusual order, the Court granted divided argument to nongovernment respondents in FCC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:53 am by Emma Llanso
FOX to determine whether regulation of "indecent" content on broadcast television violates the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:53 am by Emma Llanso
FOX to determine whether regulation of "indecent" content on broadcast television violates the First Amendment. [read post]