Search for: "Francis v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Mungovan, UNITED STATES: HEDGE FUND DUE DILIGENCE: A US LITIGATOR'S PERSPECTIVE, Mondaq Article ID: 48320***Jennifer L. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:25 am
In the United States, the doctrine was enshrined in the famous property rights case of Johnson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am
Items written by BG Lieber on military and constitutional law: Constitutional Uses of the Military Forces of the United States, 1898. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
The Brandenburg v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Since the United States Supreme Court recognized agency amicus interpretations as a source of controlling law entitled to deference in Auer v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:44 am
First, the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:11 am
In its June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
V. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Erskine's position was quoted by the defense in the 1806 case United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:15 am
The United States referred to the principle established by these bulls in the 1823 Supreme Court decision, Johnson vs. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Today, Oct. 9, is Indigenous Peoples’ Day in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:54 pm
United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), which outlined the limits of free speech, particularly in war time. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Second, Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis… [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:10 am
United States, described what happened next: “[Abel] was taken to a local administrative headquarters and then flown in a special aircraft to a special detention camp over 1,000 miles away. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:07 am
Francis Steinberg and Morton Rudberg. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
