Search for: "Frye v. Frye"
Results 221 - 240
of 637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:33 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
In the first case, Missouri v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:09 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
Frye v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
Jones v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:08 am
The Court held that the expert evidence presented satisfied the scientific reliability test set forth in Frye v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 7:00 am
Given the extreme importance of expert testimony to litigation, is the reliability test for expert testimony set out in Daubert v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 5:16 pm
In Donnellan v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:36 am
Goeb v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm
It has long been the law that New York State follows the Frye standard for scientific evidence and expert testimony, in that the same is required to be generally accepted in its relevant field (see Frye v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:18 am
"… [O]ur de novo review of Judge Morrissey's [trial court judge] Frye analysis is not limited to the evidence presented at the Frye hearing. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:53 am
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in Muhammad v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:05 am
This test, which was established in Frye v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 6:04 pm
Frye Perry v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:56 pm
Tharaldson, 615 N.W.2d 800, 810 (Minn.2000) [reaffirming adherence to Frye-Mack standard after Daubert v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:43 am
In one, Missouri v. [read post]
