Search for: "G Young"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2022, 4:18 am
Chambers Associate Justice Paul Wooten Associate Justice William G. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am
The Getting Into Equity paper was part of the Notre Dame Law Review's federal courts symposium issue on equity, and it had a stellar set of scholars writing on equity (Rachel Bayefsky, Seth Davis, Kellen Funk, John Harrison, Andrew Kull, Michael Morley, Jim Pfander and Peter Douglas, Fred Smith, Mila Sohoni, and Ernie Young). [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:42 pm
Episode 2 of She-Hulk: Attorney at Law is exactly the kind of show that we want to cover her on the SuperHuman Law Division Podcast! [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:14 am
Pregnant women, the elderly, young children, and people such as cancer patients who have weakened immune systems are particularly at risk of serious illnesses, life-threatening infections, and other complications. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention Repository In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 June 2023, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm
NITZ, by his attorneys, MICHAEL G. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:55 am
They found bonus depreciation raised investment in eligible capital relative to ineligible capital by 10.4 percent in the first episode and by 16.9 percent in the second episode, with small firms responding more than large firms.[4] Economists Daniel G. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 11:44 am
Of course, anyone accused of a crime in either Texas state courts or the federal system gains quite a bit with dropped criminal charges, especially when the case is very young – but there is always a concern that the other shoe may drop. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
Goodman, and Douglas G. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:32 pm
Federal law similarly prohibits persons subject to protective orders or convicted of domestic violence from possessing firearms (18 USC § 922(g)(8)(9)). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:34 am
Pregnant women, the elderly, young children, and people such as cancer patients who have weakened immune systems are particularly at risk of serious illnesses, life-threatening infections, and other complications. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:40 pm
Students should not have to fear expulsion for expressing themselves on social media after school and off-campus, but that is just what happened to the plaintiff in C1.G v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:41 am
Three Russian missiles have struck the Ukrainian city of Vinnytsia, killing 12 people including a young child and wounding dozens. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
Two years later, Andrew G. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:21 am
Chad G. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
Blinken will meet with Wang this week on the sidelines of the G- 20 meeting in Bali. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm
(d) libraries, public playgrounds, public parks, and zoos; (e) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, funded, or approved by the office of children and family services that provides services to children, youth, or young adults… (f) nursery schools, preschools, and summer camps; (g) the location of any program licensed, regulated, certified, operated, or funded by the office for people with developmental disabilities; (h) the location of any program… [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:24 am
Young is a 40-year veteran in state government and is a former deputy AG. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
