Search for: "GAMBLE v. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2020, 3:23 pm
The February 6 decision in White v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
A prepublication draft of the LQR article is here.In Gamble, Justice Samuel Alito Jr., writing for a 7-2 majority, stated that the defendant, Terrance Gamble, could not rely on the seventeenth-century Hutchinson decision, which was said to have barred an English trial for murder after the suspect had been acquitted in Portugal, in arguing that double jeopardy barred his conviction for a gun possession offense in state and federal court. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 11:05 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:18 pm
In State v Price, Mr. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 10:37 am
The industry is simply on the decline in our state.On the gambling side, we've always been a distant second to Las Vegas, and our state-sponsored gambling took a hit when we finally gave up relying on our own thing and joined the multistate Powerball in 2013. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:21 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:42 am
Heeb's stated results support his overarching conclusion, namely that skill predominates over chance in poker. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 10:29 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
As previously stated, the Court determined that Mason received the benefit of her bargain. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
He wrote in State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
§ 1177 (confiscation of gambling devices) and 7 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:26 pm
Gamble v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 6:03 am
Scott Pruitt, Gambling, Gambling / Gaming, Greece v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:38 am
Today, the Court agreed to consider the issue, in Gamble v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:58 am
The Court’s upcoming ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:16 pm
Prime Table Games, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:45 pm
Here the judge relies on a case from the 9th Circuit in California, Kremen v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:24 pm
In Offutt v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
Under that exception, a trial in federal court does not preclude a subsequent trial in state court for the same underlying conduct, nor vice-versa.But what if the Supreme Court eliminates the separate sovereigns exception, as it was asked to do last week during the oral argument in Gamble v. [read post]
