Search for: "GARNER v. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 2:20 am
There’s been a lot of discussion in the blawgosphere lately about Bryan Garner’s interviews with eight sitting Justices of the United States (as of 2007), in which the Justices uniformly agreed that the briefs submitted to them were too long and raised too many issues. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am
There's been a lot of discussion in the blawgosphere lately about Bryan Garner's interviews with eight sitting Justices of the United States (as of 2007), in which the Justices uniformly agreed that the briefs submitted to them were too long and raised too many issues. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
The unusual case of Bagley v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
The unusual case of Bagley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:50 am
Supreme Court Global Process Systems Inc & Anor v Berhad [2011] UKSC 5 (1 February 2011) ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Steed v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 75 (01 February 2011) Barclay & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 32 (01 February 2011) Hereworth v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 74 (01 February 2011) Welsh v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 73 (01 February 2011)… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:01 pm
GROCHOCINSKI v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Both cases have garnered heavy press interest, and for good reason. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:28 am
United States, overruled Harris v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:15 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
It noted that when a relevant state law is established by a decision of “the State’s highest court,” that decision is “binding on the federal courts”; however, the views of the State’s attorney general, while attracting “respectful consideration,” do not garner controlling weight. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
Specifically, Garner contends that the district courterred in denying his motion for a new trial based on a violation of Brady v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:56 am
While several recent Supreme Court decisions have garnered significant headlines, the Court’s late June ruling in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm
See Columbia v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
See Flanagan v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
State Street Bank v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
Nor, the state continues, is certiorari warranted based either on the prospect of overruling the Court's decision in Murray v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:50 pm
See Kallick v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 10:50 pm
In PayPal, Inc. v. [read post]
