Search for: "GRANT et al v. HOLDER et al" Results 221 - 240 of 463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am by Marissa Miller
Holder, and Fisher v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:46 am by Florian Mueller
Let me just quote from a very recent ruling written by Chief Judge Rader, Douglas Dynamics v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:12 am by Matthew Lanahan
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Litman The decision in Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am by Marissa Miller
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
Cook-Deegan et al., Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: Comparing breast and ovarian cancers with colon cancers, GENET. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm by Moderator
Directors may be removed at any time by the votes, cast to that effect by the holders of the majority of the subscribed shares with a voting right in the elections of directors. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
  Its proceedings would necessarily be ex parte and in secret, and, like a FISA court, I suspect almost all of the government’s applications would be granted, because, like a FISA application, the government would be sure to present a compelling case. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:51 pm by Anna Gelpern
 There was a related exchange between Boies and the court on whether the old and the new contracts were effectively linked through the pari passu clause, or totally independent (Boies), and whether paying the Exchange Bondholders without also paying NML et al. would amont to granting new debt priority over old debt. [read post]