Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am
Accordingly, the United States does not ask the district court to grant any relief to the plaintiff, nor to enjoin enforcement of section 3 of DOMA; it only argues that the district court should deny the motion to dismiss. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Yesterday’s second grant, in Lozman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:47 pm
United States In Clendening v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 4:20 pm
The DOJ filed the case, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 11:03 pm
In Continental Casualty et al. v United States of America et al, U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am
Torres, and the United States as amicus curiae, argue that the states did so. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:38 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
United States. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
United States, a case with potentially broad implications for the income tax system. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:23 pm
II, § 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:43 pm
United States, 947 F.3d 1159, 1175 (9th Cir. 2020). [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm
[x] In United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
Certiorari is appropriate when “a United States court of appeals . . . has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings . . . as to call for an exercise of this Court’s supervisory power. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:05 am
Supreme Court after being invited to express its views on whether certiorari should be granted in Holy See v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Queen on the Application of Medical Justice v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1710 - read judgment People who make unsuccessful claims to enter or remain in the United Kingdom cannot be removed without being given sufficient time for a lawyer to prepare a proper challenge to their claim. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
