Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE et al" Results 221 - 240 of 575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Certiorari -- No basis for certiorari review regarding grant of motion for protective order as to interrogatories and order declaring plaintiff a “vexatious litigant” -- Jurisdiction -- Appeal of dismissal for failure to state a cause of action with leave for plaintiff to amend is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the dismissal is a non-final orderPATRICK NEPTUNE, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Department of the Interior et al. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:27 am
 Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991), but advised that its grant of authority for that particular deposition should not be considered precedent, and China has not permitted a deposition since. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am by Rachael Vaughn
Policy et al., A Patent System for the 21st Century (Stephen A. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm by Marie Louise
ECORE International, et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) BPAI expands the reach of Agilent doctrine in Ex Parte Smart: Agilent Technologies v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am by Kelly
Blizzard (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Patent Arcade) (WIRED) (Ars Technica) US – IV files patent suits against nine companies  – Intellectual Ventures v Altera et al; Intellectual Ventures v Check Point Software et al; Intellectual Ventures v Hynix et al(Patently-O) (IAM) (IAM) (IPBiz) (271 Patent Blog) (PatLit) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please… [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am by Andrew Spillane
 Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm by Brett Trout
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. certainly could be a contender. [read post]