Search for: "GREEN V. GREEN" Results 221 - 240 of 9,635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
If the issue = employment = Request a Priority Conference, NOT an MSC In the case of Green v Golden Drop, 2023 Cal. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am by Joshua Matz
Michaels Professor of Law UCLA School of Law Timothy Naftali Senior Research Scholar Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs Victoria Nourse Ralph V. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Green, in Scotland and Sweet & Maxwell Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 2:13 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
On the other hand, there is a green light on the horizon when looking specifically at the second half of 2023 and perhaps that tendency is carried forth into the New Year. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 11:54 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Special Issue: Global Policy Review David Kleimann, Niclas Poitiers, André Sapir, Simone Tagliapietra, Nicolas Véron, Reinhilde Veugelers, & Jeromin Zettelmeyer, Green tech race? [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”Pursuantto the doctrine of [the] law of the case:, judicial determinations made during the course of … litigation before final judgment is entered may have preclusive effect provided thatthe parties had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the initial detetmination” (Sterngass v Town Bd. of Town of Clarkstown, 43 ADJd 1037, I 037 [2d Dept 2007]; see Ruffino v Green; 72 AD3d 785, 786 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Although in Pumpelly v Green Bay Company (1872) the Court declared that an interference with the common use of property could be the equivalent of a taking, it subsequently retreated to the view that 5th Amendment was confined to appropriation of title or physical takings. [read post]